
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2134
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +71.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2134 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2134
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,356 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E-2134
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +71.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 71W, a 6W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2134 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,356 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E-2134?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 234 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E-2134


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E-2134
Xeon E-2134
The Xeon E-2134 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 71 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 9,356 points. Launch price was $256.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2134 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2134 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2134 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E-2134 uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E-2134's 9,356 — a 82.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2134.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 22,430+140% | 9,356 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2134 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2134 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











