
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2386G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +14.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,468 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E-2386G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 248 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E-2386G


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E-2386G
Xeon E-2386G
The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E-2386G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 14.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2386G.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,430+15% | 19,468 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2386G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











