
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2468
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,652).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E-2468
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,652).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E-2468 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon E-2468 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2468 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 616 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 533 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 666 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 608 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 535 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 490 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 382 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E-2468


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E-2468 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 17.2% lead for the Xeon E-2468. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 26,652+19% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E-2468 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











