Ryzen 7 3700X
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5-2650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +43.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2650 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2650 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,662 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E5-2650 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Xeon E5-2650 v3
The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E5-2650 v3's 11,662 — a 63.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 22,430+92% | 11,662 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2650 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2650 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2650 v3) — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+50% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E5-2650 v3
