Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 22,430).
❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 22,430).
❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better fit. You are getting 45.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 3700X is 157.0% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 76.4% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon E5-4667 v3 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	200 FPS	175 FPS
medium	163 FPS	151 FPS
high	137 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	147 FPS
medium	121 FPS	123 FPS
high	100 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	68 FPS
medium	71 FPS	61 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	561 FPS	212 FPS
medium	525 FPS	193 FPS
high	428 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	183 FPS
medium	471 FPS	166 FPS
high	394 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	115 FPS
medium	304 FPS	106 FPS
high	274 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	74 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	561 FPS	385 FPS
medium	561 FPS	385 FPS
high	561 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	385 FPS
medium	561 FPS	385 FPS
high	538 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	385 FPS
medium	394 FPS	359 FPS
high	343 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	270 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
1080p
low	561 FPS	385 FPS
medium	561 FPS	385 FPS
high	561 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	385 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	385 FPS
medium	561 FPS	385 FPS
high	561 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	385 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	385 FPS
medium	501 FPS	385 FPS
high	447 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	358 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon E5-4667 v3

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E5-4667 v3

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 41.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 37.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+52%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	40 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	22,430+46%	15,397

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 debuted at $128. On MSRP ($329 vs $128), the Xeon E5-4667 v3 is $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 55.3% better value option.