
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon E5405
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5405 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5405 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5405: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +480.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 712.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 8.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $209 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌57.4% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$209 MSRP
Xeon E5405
2007Why buy it
- ✅Costs $120 less on MSRP ($209 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,753 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($209 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E5405?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E5405 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E5405
The Xeon E5405 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 November 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Harpertown (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,753 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5405 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5405 — a 75% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5405 uses Harpertown (2007−2008) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E5405's 1,753 — a 171% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 12 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E5405.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+120% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+8433% | 6 MB (total) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-84% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Harpertown (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 22,430+1180% | 1,753 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5405 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR2-667 on the Xeon E5405 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 379.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 0 (Xeon E5405) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+380% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x (Xeon E5405). Primary use case: Xeon E5405 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon E5405 came in at $209. On launch pricing ($329 vs $209), Xeon E5405 was $120 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 8.4 pts/$ for the Xeon E5405 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 156.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5405 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $209-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+712% | 8.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













