
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5607
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +502.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 242.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌143.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
Xeon E5607
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,686 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E5607
2011Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +502.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Delivers 242.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $194 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌143.7% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,686 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E5607?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 67 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E5607


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E5607
Xeon E5607
The Xeon E5607 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 0.27 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,686 points. Launch price was $135.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5607 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 0.27 GHz on the Xeon E5607 — a 176.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.26 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon E5607 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E5607's 2,686 — a 157.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E5607.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+1530% | 0.27 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+59% | 2.26 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-78% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 22,430+735% | 2,686 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5607 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+100% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon E5607 debuted at $135. On MSRP ($329 vs $135), the Xeon E5607 is $194 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5607 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 109.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E5607 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $135-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+243% | 19.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











