Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon E7-4890 v2

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

15 Cores30 Thrd155 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2014

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 30,946).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E7-4890 v2

2014

Why buy it

  • +38% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • 33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon E7-4890 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E7-4890 v2 is the better fit. You are getting 38% better PassMark, backed by 15 cores and 30 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 22.1% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon E7-4890 v2 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 38% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low200 FPS186 FPS
medium163 FPS148 FPS
high137 FPS118 FPS
ultra110 FPS92 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS153 FPS
medium121 FPS119 FPS
high100 FPS92 FPS
ultra80 FPS73 FPS
4K
low84 FPS72 FPS
medium71 FPS59 FPS
high56 FPS46 FPS
ultra44 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low561 FPS368 FPS
medium525 FPS324 FPS
high428 FPS270 FPS
ultra383 FPS216 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS318 FPS
medium471 FPS282 FPS
high394 FPS238 FPS
ultra337 FPS184 FPS
4K
low350 FPS199 FPS
medium304 FPS178 FPS
high274 FPS152 FPS
ultra242 FPS121 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low561 FPS774 FPS
medium561 FPS774 FPS
high561 FPS763 FPS
ultra561 FPS679 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS744 FPS
medium561 FPS638 FPS
high538 FPS605 FPS
ultra470 FPS537 FPS
4K
low499 FPS479 FPS
medium394 FPS376 FPS
high343 FPS335 FPS
ultra275 FPS274 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
1080p
low561 FPS774 FPS
medium561 FPS774 FPS
high561 FPS765 FPS
ultra561 FPS648 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS774 FPS
medium561 FPS686 FPS
high561 FPS586 FPS
ultra555 FPS493 FPS
4K
low561 FPS581 FPS
medium501 FPS506 FPS
high447 FPS442 FPS
ultra396 FPS377 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E7-4890 v2

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon E7-4890 v2

The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 31.9% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
15 / 30+88%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+29%
3.4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+29%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB
37.5 MB+17%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-68%
22 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
22,430
30,946+38%
Cinebench R23 Multi
6,500
Geekbench 6 Single
730
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
Socket
AM4
LGA2011
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200+33%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
32+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon E7-4890 v2
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Enterprise Server (Legacy)