
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 30,946).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+38% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon E7-4890 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.1% higher average FPS across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+38% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 30,946).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-4890 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon E7-4890 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 46 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon E7-4890 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 763 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 679 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 744 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 638 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 765 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 648 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 686 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 493 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 506 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 442 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 377 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon E7-4890 v2


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon E7-4890 v2
Xeon E7-4890 v2
The Xeon E7-4890 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 30,946 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon E7-4890 v2's 30,946 — a 31.9% lead for the Xeon E7-4890 v2. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-4890 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 15 / 30+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 37.5 MB+17% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 30,946+38% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 6,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 730 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 5,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E7-4890 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E7-4890 v2 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E7-4890 v2 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon E7-4890 v2). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 32 (Xeon E7-4890 v2) — the Xeon E7-4890 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C602 (Xeon E7-4890 v2).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+33% | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1536 GB+1100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon E7-4890 v2). Primary use case: Xeon E7-4890 v2 targets Enterprise Server (Legacy). Direct competitor: Xeon E7-4890 v2 rivals Xeon E5-2697 v2.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon E7-4890 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server (Legacy) |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











