Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Gold 5218T

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 5218T

16 Cores32 Thrd105 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
  • Costs $1,243 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
  • Delivers 400.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,572 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218T, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.

Xeon Gold 5218T

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (21,433 vs 22,430).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,572 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 5218T?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 5218T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.9% more average FPS across 42 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better fit. You are getting 4.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $1,243 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $1,572 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.9% average FPS lead across 42 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 400.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon Gold 5218T is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more overall headroom and a better platform outlook.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low200 FPS185 FPS
medium163 FPS148 FPS
high137 FPS119 FPS
ultra110 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS147 FPS
medium121 FPS116 FPS
high100 FPS92 FPS
ultra80 FPS72 FPS
4K
low84 FPS68 FPS
medium71 FPS57 FPS
high56 FPS45 FPS
ultra44 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low561 FPS212 FPS
medium525 FPS186 FPS
high428 FPS160 FPS
ultra383 FPS135 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS183 FPS
medium471 FPS165 FPS
high394 FPS142 FPS
ultra337 FPS119 FPS
4K
low350 FPS118 FPS
medium304 FPS107 FPS
high274 FPS98 FPS
ultra242 FPS81 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low561 FPS536 FPS
medium561 FPS536 FPS
high561 FPS495 FPS
ultra561 FPS429 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS536 FPS
medium561 FPS449 FPS
high538 FPS408 FPS
ultra470 FPS354 FPS
4K
low499 FPS399 FPS
medium394 FPS314 FPS
high343 FPS281 FPS
ultra275 FPS226 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
1080p
low561 FPS536 FPS
medium561 FPS536 FPS
high561 FPS536 FPS
ultra561 FPS536 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS536 FPS
medium561 FPS536 FPS
high561 FPS536 FPS
ultra555 FPS468 FPS
4K
low561 FPS500 FPS
medium501 FPS449 FPS
high447 FPS400 FPS
ultra396 FPS345 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 5218T

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon Gold 5218T

The Xeon Gold 5218T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,433 points. Launch price was $1,561.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218T offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218T — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 5218T's 21,433 — a 4.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218T.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+16%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+71%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+45%
22 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
16 MB+3100%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark
22,430+5%
21,433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5218T debuted at $1572. On MSRP ($329 vs $1572), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1243 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218T — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 133.3% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Gold 5218T
MSRP
$329-79%
$1572
Performance per Dollar
68.2+401%
13.6
Release Date
2019
2019