
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 5315Y
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5315Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,477 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 5315Y?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 108 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 481 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 272 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 334 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 5315Y


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 5315Y
Xeon Gold 5315Y
The Xeon Gold 5315Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,477 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 5315Y share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5315Y — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 5315Y's 20,477 — a 9.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5315Y.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+167% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,430+10% | 20,477 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5315Y uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5315Y |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











