
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon Gold 5318H
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Gold 5318H Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Gold 5318H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Gold 5318H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 29,301).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5318H, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 5318H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Gold 5318H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+30.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 5318H?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Gold 5318H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 5318H
The Xeon Gold 5318H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Cooper Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 RDIMM. Passmark benchmark score: 29,301 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5318H offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 5318H has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5318H — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5318H uses Cooper Lake-SP (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 5318H's 29,301 — a 26.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 5318H. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5318H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5318H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+29% | 24.75 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+51100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 29,301+31% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,063 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5318H uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR4-2667 on the Xeon Gold 5318H — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5318H supports up to 1152 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 5318H). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 5318H) — the Xeon Gold 5318H offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C620 Series (Xeon Gold 5318H).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5318H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4189 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | DDR4-2667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1152 GB+800% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 5318H). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5318H targets Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5318H rivals EPYC 7352.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5318H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Cloud Infrastructure / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












