
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 5520+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $754 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 61,227).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 53 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5520+, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5520+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅+173% higher PassMark.
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 5520+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $754 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 56.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,083 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+173% higher PassMark.
- ✅+64.1% larger total L3 cache (53 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 61,227).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 53 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5520+, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 5520+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 56.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,083 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 5520+?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 98 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 875 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 792 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 749 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 728 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 632 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 767 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 674 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 498 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 5520+


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 5520+
Xeon Gold 5520+
The Xeon Gold 5520+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 52.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 61,227 points. Launch price was $1,640.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon Gold 5520+ has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 5520+'s 61,227 — a 92.8% lead for the Xeon Gold 5520+. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 52.5 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5520+.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 28 / 56+250% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+10% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 52.5 MB (total)+64% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 61,227+173% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5520+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon Gold 5520+ — the Xeon Gold 5520+ supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 5520+ supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 5520+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 5520+) — the Xeon Gold 5520+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 5520+).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5520+). Primary use case: Xeon Gold 5520+ targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 5520+ rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 5520+ debuted at $1083. On MSRP ($329 vs $1083), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $754 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 56.5 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5520+ — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 18.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 5520+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-70% | $1083 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+21% | 56.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











