
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6150
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,029 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 765.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,447).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6150, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Xeon Gold 6150
2017Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,358 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6150
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +27.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $3,029 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 765.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 7.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,358 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+17.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,447).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6150, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,358 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6150?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 346 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 307 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 216 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 148 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 655 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 512 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 261 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 577 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6150


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6150
Xeon Gold 6150
The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6150 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 16.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6150. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+29% | 24.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 18 MB+3500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 26,447+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6150 debuted at $3358. On MSRP ($329 vs $3358), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3029 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 7.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6150 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 158.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6150 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-90% | $3358 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+763% | 7.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











