
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,071 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1027.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,552 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6250
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $3,071 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1027.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,400 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,552 vs 22,430).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 417 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 512 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 211 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6250


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6250
Xeon Gold 6250
The Xeon Gold 6250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,552 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6250 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6250 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon Gold 6250 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6250's 20,552 — a 8.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6250.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz+8% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 35.75 MB+12% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430+9% | 20,552 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6250 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6250 debuted at $3400. On MSRP ($329 vs $3400), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3071 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6250 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 167.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-90% | $3400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+1037% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











