PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,379 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
✅Delivers 389.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 37,739).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6346

2021

Why buy it

✅+68.3% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon Gold 6346

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,379 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
✅Delivers 389.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,708 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+68.3% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 37,739).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6346, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,708 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6346?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Gold 6346 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6346 is the better fit. You are getting 68.3% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $2,379 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $2,708 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Gold 6346 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 68.3% better PassMark. It is also 389.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 13.9 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Gold 6346 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon Gold 6346 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
1080p
low	200 FPS	188 FPS
medium	163 FPS	150 FPS
high	137 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	157 FPS
medium	121 FPS	122 FPS
high	100 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	72 FPS
medium	71 FPS	60 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6346

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
1080p
low	561 FPS	415 FPS
medium	525 FPS	364 FPS
high	428 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	237 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	355 FPS
medium	471 FPS	317 FPS
high	394 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	204 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	220 FPS
medium	304 FPS	200 FPS
high	274 FPS	169 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	136 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6346

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
1080p
low	561 FPS	943 FPS
medium	561 FPS	856 FPS
high	561 FPS	810 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	719 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	784 FPS
medium	561 FPS	673 FPS
high	538 FPS	637 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	567 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	503 FPS
medium	394 FPS	395 FPS
high	343 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	288 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6346

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
1080p
low	561 FPS	943 FPS
medium	561 FPS	918 FPS
high	561 FPS	790 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	670 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	819 FPS
medium	561 FPS	703 FPS
high	561 FPS	601 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	506 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	594 FPS
medium	501 FPS	516 FPS
high	447 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	383 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Gold 6346

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6346

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6346

The Xeon Gold 6346 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 37,739 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6346 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6346 — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6346's 37,739 — a 50.9% lead for the Xeon Gold 6346. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 36 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6346.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+22%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+16%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	36 MB (total)+13%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	22,430	37,739+68%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6346 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3200 on the Xeon Gold 6346 — the Xeon Gold 6346 supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6346 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6346). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon Gold 6346) — the Xeon Gold 6346 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C621A (Xeon Gold 6346).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200+79900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+2184433%	6144
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6346). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6346 rivals EPYC 73F3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Gold 6346
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6346 debuted at $2708. On MSRP ($329 vs $2708), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2379 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 13.9 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6346 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 132.1% better value option.