
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6421N
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,039 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 58,797).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6421N, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6421N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅+162.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6421N
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $2,039 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 24.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,368 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 185W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+162.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 58,797).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6421N, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6421N moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,368 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌184.6% higher power demand at 185W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Gold 6421N?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 201 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 956 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 837 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 793 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 705 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 668 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 279 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 923 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 832 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 717 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 619 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 715 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 538 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 349 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6421N


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6421N
Xeon Gold 6421N
The Xeon Gold 6421N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 185 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 58,797 points. Launch price was $2,368.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6421N has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6421N — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6421N's 58,797 — a 89.5% lead for the Xeon Gold 6421N. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 60 MB on the Xeon Gold 6421N.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 60 MB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 58,797+162% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6421N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4800 on the Xeon Gold 6421N — the Xeon Gold 6421N supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6421N supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6421N). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6421N) — the Xeon Gold 6421N offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6421N).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 4800+119900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6421N). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6421N rivals EPYC 9354.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6421N debuted at $2368. On MSRP ($329 vs $2368), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2039 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 24.8 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6421N — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 93.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6421N |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-86% | $2368 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+175% | 24.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











