
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,397 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 73,387).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6548Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Gold 6548Y+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,397 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,726 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (60 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6548Y+ across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 73,387).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 60 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6548Y+, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Gold 6548Y+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,726 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6548Y+ better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 542 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 473 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 892 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 807 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 748 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 659 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 687 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 944 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 851 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 737 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 587 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 450 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 386 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Gold 6548Y+


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Gold 6548Y+
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 73,387 points. Launch price was $3,726.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Gold 6548Y+'s 73,387 — a 106.4% lead for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+7% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 60 MB (total)+88% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 73,387+227% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5200 on the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6548Y+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+) — the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Gold 6548Y+).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5200+129900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6548Y+). Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6548Y+ rivals EPYC 9454.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ debuted at $3726. On MSRP ($329 vs $3726), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3397 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6548Y+ — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 110.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Gold 6548Y+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-91% | $3726 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+246% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











