
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8160
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,989).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Platinum 8160
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+29.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,989).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Platinum 8160?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 652 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 710 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 610 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 576 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 508 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 360 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 320 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 260 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 670 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 381 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 330 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Platinum 8160


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Platinum 8160
Xeon Platinum 8160
The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 25.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 33 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 24 MB+4700% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 28,989+29% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 2666+66550% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+17476167% | 768 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8160 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











