Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Platinum 8160

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

24 Cores48 Thrd150 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +23.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,989).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8160, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Platinum 8160 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Platinum 8160

2017

Why buy it

  • +29.2% higher PassMark.
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Platinum 8160?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Platinum 8160 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8160 is the better fit. You are getting 29.2% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 23.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Platinum 8160 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 29.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low200 FPS195 FPS
medium163 FPS158 FPS
high137 FPS128 FPS
ultra110 FPS100 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS157 FPS
medium121 FPS123 FPS
high100 FPS96 FPS
ultra80 FPS76 FPS
4K
low84 FPS72 FPS
medium71 FPS60 FPS
high56 FPS47 FPS
ultra44 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low561 FPS212 FPS
medium525 FPS188 FPS
high428 FPS161 FPS
ultra383 FPS137 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS184 FPS
medium471 FPS167 FPS
high394 FPS143 FPS
ultra337 FPS120 FPS
4K
low350 FPS120 FPS
medium304 FPS109 FPS
high274 FPS100 FPS
ultra242 FPS82 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low561 FPS725 FPS
medium561 FPS725 FPS
high561 FPS725 FPS
ultra561 FPS652 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS710 FPS
medium561 FPS610 FPS
high538 FPS576 FPS
ultra470 FPS508 FPS
4K
low499 FPS458 FPS
medium394 FPS360 FPS
high343 FPS320 FPS
ultra275 FPS260 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
1080p
low561 FPS725 FPS
medium561 FPS725 FPS
high561 FPS670 FPS
ultra561 FPS583 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS679 FPS
medium561 FPS593 FPS
high561 FPS515 FPS
ultra555 FPS442 FPS
4K
low561 FPS477 FPS
medium501 FPS427 FPS
high447 FPS381 FPS
ultra396 FPS330 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Platinum 8160

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8160

The Xeon Platinum 8160 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 28,989 points. Launch price was $4,702.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8160 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Platinum 8160's 28,989 — a 25.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8160. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 33 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8160.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+19%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+71%
2.1 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB
33 MB+3%
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
24 MB+4700%
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark
22,430
28,989+29%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8160 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 2666 on the Xeon Platinum 8160 — the Xeon Platinum 8160 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8160 supports up to 768 of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8160). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8160) — the Xeon Platinum 8160 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C621 (Xeon Platinum 8160).

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
2666+66550%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+17476167%
768
RAM Channels
2
6+200%
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
48+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8160). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8160 rivals EPYC 7451.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XXeon Platinum 8160
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d