
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11,271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 841.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8592+ across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 84,013).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8592+, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Platinum 8592+
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11,271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 841.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 7.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $11,600 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8592+ across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 84,013).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8592+, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Platinum 8592+ moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($11,600 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Platinum 8592+ better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 141 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 99 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 849 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 730 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 641 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 737 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 626 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 558 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 938 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 849 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 732 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 633 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 776 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 497 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 383 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Platinum 8592+


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Platinum 8592+
Xeon Platinum 8592+
The Xeon Platinum 8592+ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 320 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 84,013 points. Launch price was $11,600.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Platinum 8592+'s 84,013 — a 115.7% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8592+. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 320 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8592+.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 64 / 128+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+89% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 320 MB (total)+900% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 84,013+275% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5600 on the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8592+ supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8592+). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8592+) — the Xeon Platinum 8592+ offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8592+).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+3276700% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 80+233% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8592+). Direct competitor: Xeon Platinum 8592+ rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8592+ debuted at $11600. On MSRP ($329 vs $11600), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $11271 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 7.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8592+ — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 161.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Platinum 8592+ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-97% | $11600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+847% | 7.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











