
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Silver 4209T
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $234 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Xeon Silver 4209T
2019Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,080 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon Silver 4209T
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +61.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+190.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 11 MB).
- ✅Costs $234 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 70W, a 5W reduction.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (11,080 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($563 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Silver 4209T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 84 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 203 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 277 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Silver 4209T


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T
The Xeon Silver 4209T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 11,080 points. Launch price was $501.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Silver 4209T share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4209T — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4209T uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Silver 4209T's 11,080 — a 67.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4209T.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+38% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+64% | 2.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+191% | 11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+102% | 11,080 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4209T uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon Silver 4209T debuted at $563. On MSRP ($329 vs $563), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $234 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 19.7 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4209T — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 110.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon Silver 4209T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-42% | $563 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+246% | 19.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











