PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.4% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 29,119).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4510T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4510T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4510T

2023

Why buy it

✅+29.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon Silver 4510T

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +28.4% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+29.8% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 80 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅233.3% more PCIe lanes (80 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 29,119).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Silver 4510T, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 80 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4510T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4510T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon Silver 4510T?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon Silver 4510T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Silver 4510T is the better fit. You are getting 29.8% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 28.4% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon Silver 4510T is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 29.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4510T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4, more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon Silver 4510T Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
1080p
low	200 FPS	175 FPS
medium	163 FPS	141 FPS
high	137 FPS	116 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	143 FPS
medium	121 FPS	113 FPS
high	100 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	66 FPS
medium	71 FPS	55 FPS
high	56 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	35 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Silver 4510T

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
1080p
low	561 FPS	234 FPS
medium	525 FPS	206 FPS
high	428 FPS	172 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	145 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	197 FPS
medium	471 FPS	180 FPS
high	394 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	128 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	128 FPS
medium	304 FPS	117 FPS
high	274 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	89 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Silver 4510T

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
1080p
low	561 FPS	728 FPS
medium	561 FPS	728 FPS
high	561 FPS	728 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	682 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	728 FPS
medium	561 FPS	634 FPS
high	538 FPS	601 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	531 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	475 FPS
medium	394 FPS	373 FPS
high	343 FPS	332 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	270 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Silver 4510T

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
1080p
low	561 FPS	728 FPS
medium	561 FPS	728 FPS
high	561 FPS	666 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	575 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	674 FPS
medium	561 FPS	590 FPS
high	561 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	436 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	464 FPS
medium	501 FPS	416 FPS
high	447 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	323 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon Silver 4510T

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon Silver 4510T

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon Silver 4510T

The Xeon Silver 4510T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 29,119 points. Launch price was $624.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Silver 4510T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4510T — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon Silver 4510T's 29,119 — a 26% lead for the Xeon Silver 4510T. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 30 MB (total) on the Xeon Silver 4510T.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+19%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+7%	30 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	22,430	29,119+30%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4510T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon Silver 4510T — the Xeon Silver 4510T supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Silver 4510T supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon Silver 4510T). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 80 (Xeon Silver 4510T) — the Xeon Silver 4510T offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon Silver 4510T).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon Silver 4510T
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	80+233%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Silver 4510T). Primary use case: Xeon Silver 4510T targets Enterprise Storage / Edge Computing. Direct competitor: Xeon Silver 4510T rivals EPYC 8124.