
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-11955M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $294 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 95.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,702 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-11955M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 476 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 348 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-11955M


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-11955M share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 3.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+33% | 24 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,430+3% | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-11955M debuted at $623. On MSRP ($329 vs $623), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $294 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 64.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-47% | $623 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+96% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











