
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-1290
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $498 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 40.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $498 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon W-1290
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,112 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($498 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-1290
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Costs $169 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $498 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 40.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $498 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-1290, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,112 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($498 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-1290?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 411 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 475 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 353 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 235 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 462 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 503 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 380 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-1290


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-1290
Xeon W-1290
The Xeon W-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 20,112 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-1290 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon W-1290 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon W-1290 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-1290 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-1290 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-1290's 20,112 — a 10.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon W-1290.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430+12% | 20,112 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-1290 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-1290 debuted at $498. On MSRP ($329 vs $498), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $169 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 40.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-1290 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 51.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-1290 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-34% | $498 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+69% | 40.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











