
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2175
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,618 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 464.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 23,507).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅+4.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,947 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +22.3% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,618 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 464.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 12.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,947 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+4.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 23,507).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,947 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-2175?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 329 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 178 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 567 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 426 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 317 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 557 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 410 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-2175


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 4.7% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+66% | 19.25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 23,507+5% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2175 debuted at $1947. On MSRP ($329 vs $1947), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1618 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 12.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2175 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 139.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-83% | $1947 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+464% | 12.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











