Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-2195

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-2195 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-2195

18 / 36

27,977

+24.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-2195 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-2195: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 140W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,977).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2195, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 186.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Xeon W-2195

2017

Why buy it

✅+24.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Delivers 173.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 186.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌115.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-2195?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-2195 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-2195 is the stronger fit. You are getting 24.7% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-2195 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in 119.3% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-2195 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 24.7% better PassMark. Xeon W-2195 is also 173.6% better value on MSRP (186.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2017) and 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-2195 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-2195

The Xeon W-2195 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,977 points. Launch price was $2,553.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2195 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon W-2195 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2195 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-2195 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-2195's 27,977 — a 22% lead for the Xeon W-2195. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2195.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-2195
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+2%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+57%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+29%	24.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	22,430	27,977+25%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	21,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	10,002

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2195 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon W-2195 — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-2195 supports up to 512 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon W-2195). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 48 (Xeon W-2195) — the Xeon W-2195 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C422 (Xeon W-2195).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-2195
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200+20%	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	512 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	48+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-2195). Primary use case: Xeon W-2195 targets Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis. Direct competitor: Xeon W-2195 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-2195
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	Scientific Workstation / Data Analysis

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon W-2195 came in at $150. On launch pricing ($329 vs $150), Xeon W-2195 was $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 186.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2195 — making the Xeon W-2195 the 92.9% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-2195
MSRP	$329	$150-54%
Performance per Dollar	68.2	186.5+173%
Release Date	2019	2017

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-2195 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.