
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-2265
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2265 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,700).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2265, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Xeon W-2265
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-2265
2019Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-2265 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,700).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2265, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 24.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-2265 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 87 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 554 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 342 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 459 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 389 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 642 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 621 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 549 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-2265


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-2265
Xeon W-2265
The Xeon W-2265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 25,700 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2265 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon W-2265 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon W-2265 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-2265 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-2265's 25,700 — a 13.6% lead for the Xeon W-2265. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 19.25 MB on the Xeon W-2265.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+66% | 19.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 25,700+15% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-2265 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-2265 debuted at $1039. On MSRP ($329 vs $1039), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $710 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 24.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-2265 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 93.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-2265 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-68% | $1039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+176% | 24.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











