
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-3223
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌11.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Xeon W-3223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,956 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon W-3223
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.3% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 17 MB).
- ✅Delivers 18.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 57.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 160W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌11.9% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$294 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,956 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (17 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 57.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌146.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-3223?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 260 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 207 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 416 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 409 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-3223


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223
The Xeon W-3223 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,956 points. Launch price was $749.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-3223 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Xeon W-3223 — a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3223 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-3223's 16,956 — a 27.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3223.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+94% | 16.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+32% | 16,956 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3223 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3223 debuted at $294. On MSRP ($329 vs $294), the Xeon W-3223 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 57.7 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3223 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 16.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon W-3223 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $294-11% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+18% | 57.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











