Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3365

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3365 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 / 16

22,430

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-3365

32 / 64

57,312

+155.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3365 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3365: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 316.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,312).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅+155.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-3365?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3365 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the stronger fit. You are getting 155.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 3700X comes in $3,170 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $3,499 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3365 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 155.5% better PassMark. It is also 316.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3365 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon W-3365 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 87.5% lead for the Xeon W-3365. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	22,430	57,312+156%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon W-3365 came in at $3499. On launch pricing ($329 vs $3499), Ryzen 7 3700X was $3170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 122.5% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
MSRP	$329-91%	$3499
Performance per Dollar	68.2+316%	16.4
Release Date	2019	2021

Search Ryzen 7 3700X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3365 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.