PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 316.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,312).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅+155.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon W-3365

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $3,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 316.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+155.5% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 57,312).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3365, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon W-3365?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3365 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3365 is the better fit. You are getting 155.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $3,170 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $3,499 MSRP, and it gives you a 5.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon W-3365 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 155.5% better PassMark. It is also 316.2% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 16.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3365 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3365 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	200 FPS	191 FPS
medium	163 FPS	154 FPS
high	137 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	157 FPS
medium	121 FPS	123 FPS
high	100 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	72 FPS
medium	71 FPS	60 FPS
high	56 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	39 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon W-3365

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	561 FPS	497 FPS
medium	525 FPS	431 FPS
high	428 FPS	345 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	285 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	425 FPS
medium	471 FPS	376 FPS
high	394 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	245 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	264 FPS
medium	304 FPS	237 FPS
high	274 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	174 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon W-3365

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	972 FPS
high	561 FPS	913 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	826 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	841 FPS
medium	561 FPS	744 FPS
high	538 FPS	699 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	626 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	540 FPS
medium	394 FPS	444 FPS
high	343 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	320 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon W-3365

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
1080p
low	561 FPS	932 FPS
medium	561 FPS	847 FPS
high	561 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	635 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	732 FPS
medium	561 FPS	644 FPS
high	561 FPS	554 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	481 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	532 FPS
medium	501 FPS	476 FPS
high	447 FPS	419 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	361 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon W-3365

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon W-3365

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon W-3365

The Xeon W-3365 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-07-29. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 57,312 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3365 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon W-3365 has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3365 — a 9.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3365 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon W-3365's 57,312 — a 87.5% lead for the Xeon W-3365. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3365.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+10%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	22,430	57,312+156%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,960
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	16,817

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3365 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3365 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3365). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3365) — the Xeon W-3365 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel C621A (Xeon W-3365).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon W-3365). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3365 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon W-3365
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3365 debuted at $3499. On MSRP ($329 vs $3499), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 16.4 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3365 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 122.5% better value option.