
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon w3-2425
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2425
2023Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,776 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon w3-2425
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+113.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 15 MB).
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 92.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 35.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $529 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 130W, a 65W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2425 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,776 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 35.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($529 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 130W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon w3-2425?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 226 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 206 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 215 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 166 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 280 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 413 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w3-2425


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w3-2425
Xeon w3-2425
The Xeon w3-2425 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,776 points. Launch price was $529.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w3-2425 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon w3-2425 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w3-2425's 18,776 — a 17.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 15 MB on the Xeon w3-2425.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+113% | 15 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430+19% | 18,776 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2425 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2425 debuted at $529. On MSRP ($329 vs $529), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $200 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 35.5 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2425 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 63.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2425 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-38% | $529 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+92% | 35.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











