
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon w3-2435
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,504).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2435 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2435
2023Why buy it
- ✅+18.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($669 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon w3-2435
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Costs $340 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 39.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $669 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+18.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,504).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2435 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($669 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon w3-2435?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 583 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 650 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 663 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 596 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w3-2435


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w3-2435
Xeon w3-2435
The Xeon w3-2435 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,504 points. Launch price was $669.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w3-2435 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2435 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2435 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w3-2435's 26,504 — a 16.7% lead for the Xeon w3-2435. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2435.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+42% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 26,504+18% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2435 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2435 debuted at $669. On MSRP ($329 vs $669), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $340 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 39.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2435 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 53% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2435 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-51% | $669 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+72% | 39.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











