
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon w3-2525
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $609 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 47.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $609 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,641).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2525, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w3-2525
2024Why buy it
- ✅+27.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($609 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon w3-2525
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+42.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 23 MB).
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $609 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 45.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 47.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $609 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 175W, a 110W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+27.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,641).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w3-2525, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w3-2525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (23 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 47.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($609 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌169.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon w3-2525?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 587 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 497 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 429 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 552 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 332 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 634 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 604 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 533 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w3-2525


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w3-2525
Xeon w3-2525
The Xeon w3-2525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 22.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 175 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4400. Passmark benchmark score: 28,641 points. Launch price was $609.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w3-2525 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon w3-2525 — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Xeon w3-2525 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w3-2525's 28,641 — a 24.3% lead for the Xeon w3-2525. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 22.5 MB on the Xeon w3-2525.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+42% | 22.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 28,641+28% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 15,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w3-2525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4400 on the Xeon w3-2525 — the Xeon w3-2525 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 2 TB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon w3-2525). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon w3-2525) — the Xeon w3-2525 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and W790 (Xeon w3-2525).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2 TB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w3-2525). Primary use case: Xeon w3-2525 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w3-2525 rivals Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w3-2525 debuted at $609. On MSRP ($329 vs $609), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $280 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 47.0 pts/$ for the Xeon w3-2525 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 36.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w3-2525 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-46% | $609 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+45% | 47.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











