PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,010 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 45,311).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon w5-3525

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,010 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Delivers 101.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,339 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 290W, a 225W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +43.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w5-3525 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 45,311).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 45 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w5-3525, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w5-3525 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,339 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌346.2% higher power demand at 290W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w5-3525 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w5-3525 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w5-3525 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 43.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w5-3525 is the better fit. You are getting 102% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w5-3525 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w5-3525 is 307.0% more expensive on MSRP at $1,339 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 43.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 101.5% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 33.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w5-3525 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 40.6% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon w5-3525 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
1080p
low	200 FPS	299 FPS
medium	163 FPS	285 FPS
high	137 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	192 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	269 FPS
medium	121 FPS	231 FPS
high	100 FPS	174 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	152 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	183 FPS
medium	71 FPS	156 FPS
high	56 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	105 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w5-3525

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
1080p
low	561 FPS	688 FPS
medium	525 FPS	594 FPS
high	428 FPS	478 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	423 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	551 FPS
medium	471 FPS	487 FPS
high	394 FPS	411 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	337 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	324 FPS
medium	304 FPS	287 FPS
high	274 FPS	266 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	231 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w5-3525

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
1080p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1045 FPS
high	561 FPS	967 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	829 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	994 FPS
medium	561 FPS	880 FPS
high	538 FPS	798 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	593 FPS
medium	394 FPS	510 FPS
high	343 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	395 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w5-3525

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
1080p
low	561 FPS	1133 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1015 FPS
high	561 FPS	999 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	866 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	1061 FPS
medium	561 FPS	918 FPS
high	561 FPS	794 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	791 FPS
medium	501 FPS	688 FPS
high	447 FPS	583 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w5-3525

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w5-3525

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w5-3525

The Xeon w5-3525 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 290 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 45,311 points. Launch price was $1,339.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w5-3525 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon w5-3525 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w5-3525 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w5-3525 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w5-3525's 45,311 — a 67.6% lead for the Xeon w5-3525. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 45 MB on the Xeon w5-3525.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	45 MB+41%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	22,430	45,311+102%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w5-3525 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4800 on the Xeon w5-3525 — the Xeon w5-3525 supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w5-3525 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon w5-3525). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 112 (Xeon w5-3525) — the Xeon w5-3525 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and W790 (Xeon w5-3525).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	4800+119900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	112+367%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon w5-3525). Direct competitor: Xeon w5-3525 rivals Threadripper PRO 7955WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w5-3525
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w5-3525 debuted at $1339. On MSRP ($329 vs $1339), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1010 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w5-3525 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 67.3% better value option.