
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-2595X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 66,049).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 49 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-2595X, which brings 26 cores / 52 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+52.3% larger total L3 cache (49 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 26 cores / 52 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon w7-2595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 250W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+52.3% larger total L3 cache (49 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 26 cores / 52 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-2595X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 66,049).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 49 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-2595X, which brings 26 cores / 52 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-2595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌284.6% higher power demand at 250W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-2595X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 312 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 288 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 108 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 406 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 400 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 287 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 232 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1219 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 1113 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 928 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 834 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 410 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1124 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1007 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 881 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 783 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 590 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 500 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w7-2595X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w7-2595X
Xeon w7-2595X
The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon w7-2595X has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-2595X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 98.6% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 26 / 52+225% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 48.75 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 66,049+194% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 48,442 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,436 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 21,758 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2595X — the Xeon w7-2595X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2595X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the Xeon w7-2595X offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w7-2595X). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-2595X debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($329 vs $2039), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1710 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 71.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-2595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $2039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+110% | 32.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











