
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon w7-3545
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 310W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 58,453).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 68 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w7-3545
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+110.9% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌376.9% higher power demand at 310W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon w7-3545
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 28.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 310W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +40.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+110.9% larger total L3 cache (68 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w7-3545 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 58,453).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 68 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w7-3545, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w7-3545 moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 28.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌376.9% higher power demand at 310W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w7-3545 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 301 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 204 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 106 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 682 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 341 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 267 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 234 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1057 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 974 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 834 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 888 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 802 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 397 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1212 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 925 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 809 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 980 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 845 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 736 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 635 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 727 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 632 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 557 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w7-3545


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w7-3545
Xeon w7-3545
The Xeon w7-3545 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 67.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 310 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 58,453 points. Launch price was $2,039.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w7-3545 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon w7-3545 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-3545 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w7-3545 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w7-3545's 58,453 — a 89.1% lead for the Xeon w7-3545. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 67.5 MB on the Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 67.5 MB+111% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 58,453+161% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,200 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-3545 uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-3545 — the Xeon w7-3545 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-3545 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon w7-3545). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 112 (Xeon w7-3545) — the Xeon w7-3545 offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel W790 (Xeon w7-3545).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w7-3545). Direct competitor: Xeon w7-3545 rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w7-3545 debuted at $2039. On MSRP ($329 vs $2039), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1710 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 28.7 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-3545 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 81.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w7-3545 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $2039 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+138% | 28.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











