PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,460 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Delivers 213.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 340W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3575X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 82,507).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3575X, which brings 44 cores / 88 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon w9-3575X

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 44 cores / 88 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌423.1% higher power demand at 340W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon w9-3575X

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,460 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Delivers 213.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 21.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,789 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 340W, a 275W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +32.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 44 cores / 88 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon w9-3575X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 82,507).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3575X, which brings 44 cores / 88 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3575X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,789 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌423.1% higher power demand at 340W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon w9-3575X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon w9-3575X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon w9-3575X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 32.0% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 98 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3575X is the better fit. You are getting 267.8% better PassMark, backed by 44 cores and 88 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 204.7% larger total L3 cache (98 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon w9-3575X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon w9-3575X is 1051.7% more expensive on MSRP at $3,789 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 32.0% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 213.1% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 21.8 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon w9-3575X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 98 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 44 cores / 88 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon w9-3575X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
1080p
low	200 FPS	316 FPS
medium	163 FPS	306 FPS
high	137 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	207 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	274 FPS
medium	121 FPS	237 FPS
high	100 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	157 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	186 FPS
medium	71 FPS	159 FPS
high	56 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	108 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w9-3575X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	384 FPS
medium	525 FPS	332 FPS
high	428 FPS	270 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	308 FPS
medium	471 FPS	273 FPS
high	394 FPS	232 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	181 FPS
medium	304 FPS	162 FPS
high	274 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	133 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w9-3575X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1086 FPS
high	561 FPS	1020 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	1009 FPS
medium	561 FPS	913 FPS
high	538 FPS	839 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	605 FPS
medium	394 FPS	521 FPS
high	343 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	400 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w9-3575X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
1080p
low	561 FPS	1160 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1015 FPS
high	561 FPS	915 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	814 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	940 FPS
medium	561 FPS	823 FPS
high	561 FPS	727 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	638 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	687 FPS
medium	501 FPS	613 FPS
high	447 FPS	551 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon w9-3575X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon w9-3575X

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w9-3575X

The Xeon w9-3575X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 44 cores and 88 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 97.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 340 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 82,507 points. Launch price was $3,789.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w9-3575X offers 44 cores / 88 threads — the Xeon w9-3575X has 36 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3575X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3575X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w9-3575X's 82,507 — a 114.5% lead for the Xeon w9-3575X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 97.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3575X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	44 / 88+450%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	97.5 MB+205%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	22,430	82,507+268%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	60,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,300
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	19,320

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3575X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3575X — the Xeon w9-3575X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3575X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3575X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3575X) — the Xeon w9-3575X offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3575X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
Socket	AM4	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-4800+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	112+367%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w9-3575X). Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3575X rivals Ryzen Threadripper 7970X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon w9-3575X
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon w9-3575X debuted at $3789. On MSRP ($329 vs $3789), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3460 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 21.8 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3575X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 103.2% better value option.