
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon w9-3595X
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w9-3595X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w9-3595X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w9-3595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,560 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 311.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 16.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,889 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 385W, a 320W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No 3D V-Cache or similar L3 advantage, which matters in CPU-limited gaming (32 MB vs 113 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 97,534).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon w9-3595X, which brings 60 cores / 120 threads and 112 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon w9-3595X moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.
Xeon w9-3595X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Massive L3 cache advantage with 113 MB vs 32 MB, which is a real win in CPU-limited gaming.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 60 cores / 120 threads, plus 112 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅366.7% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,889 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌492.3% higher power demand at 385W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon w9-3595X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon w9-3595X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon w9-3595X
The Xeon w9-3595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 60 cores and 120 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 112.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 385 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 97,534 points. Launch price was $5,889.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon w9-3595X offers 60 cores / 120 threads — the Xeon w9-3595X has 52 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3595X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Xeon w9-3595X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon w9-3595X's 97,534 — a 125.2% lead for the Xeon w9-3595X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 112.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 60 / 120+650% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 112.5 MB+252% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+25500% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 97,534+335% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 130,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 17,118 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3595X — the Xeon w9-3595X supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3595X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3595X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3595X) — the Xeon w9-3595X offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and W790 (Xeon w9-3595X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA4677 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 112+367% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Xeon w9-3595X). Primary use case: Xeon w9-3595X targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon w9-3595X rivals Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 3700X was priced at $329, while the Xeon w9-3595X came in at $5889. On launch pricing ($329 vs $5889), Ryzen 7 3700X was $5560 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 16.6 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3595X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 121.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon w9-3595X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-94% | $5889 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+311% | 16.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













