PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max 385 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅+17.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen AI Max 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+17.9% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Ryzen 7 5700X.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,500).
❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max 385 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 385 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 5700X is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 385 pulls ahead with 17.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 385 is the better fit. You are getting 17.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max 385 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you 17.9% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 5700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 385 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 385 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	156 FPS	257 FPS
medium	129 FPS	234 FPS
high	115 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	174 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	222 FPS
medium	111 FPS	183 FPS
high	95 FPS	153 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	154 FPS
medium	67 FPS	127 FPS
high	55 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	86 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	649 FPS	592 FPS
medium	549 FPS	500 FPS
high	448 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	346 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	508 FPS
medium	484 FPS	452 FPS
high	407 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	303 FPS
medium	303 FPS	273 FPS
high	277 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	209 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	665 FPS	780 FPS
medium	557 FPS	611 FPS
high	509 FPS	534 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	447 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	676 FPS
medium	458 FPS	534 FPS
high	419 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	476 FPS
medium	322 FPS	394 FPS
high	292 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	288 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max 385

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
1080p
low	665 FPS	807 FPS
medium	665 FPS	807 FPS
high	665 FPS	779 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	700 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	796 FPS
medium	665 FPS	706 FPS
high	607 FPS	619 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	536 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	554 FPS
medium	488 FPS	499 FPS
high	439 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	389 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen AI Max 385

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max 385

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen AI Max 385

The Ryzen AI Max 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,274 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max 385 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen AI Max 385's 32,274 — a 19.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 16,500 (16.4% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 2,800, a 27.8% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 14,000 (36.1% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 385). Both processors carry 32 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	5 GHz+9%
Base Clock	3.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	26,609	32,274+21%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	16,500+18%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	2,800+32%
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	14,000+44%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 385 — the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 385). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 20 (Ryzen AI Max 385) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max 385).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
Socket	AM4	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5x-8000+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen AI Max 385 targets High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen AI Max 385 rivals Core Ultra 9 285H.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen AI Max 385
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	High-performance AI / Gaming Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 385 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($299 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 385 is $299 cheaper.