
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 51,646).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.2% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Ryzen 7 5700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 51,646).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $299 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 103 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 774 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 652 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 461 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 264 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1022 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 789 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 686 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 584 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 819 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 642 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 554 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 566 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 415 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 349 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 1162 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 902 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 803 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 887 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 682 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 598 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's 51,646 — a 64% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+13% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 26,609 | 51,646+94% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) — the Ryzen 7 5700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 8000+199900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+104857500% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Ryzen 7 5700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($299 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $299 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












