PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 302.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,780).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅+34.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 302.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+34.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,780).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1950, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1950?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 1950 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is the better fit. You are getting 34.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 5700X is $700 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and it gives you a 19.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 34.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. It is also 302.7% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 22.1 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2017). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 1950 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	156 FPS	173 FPS
medium	129 FPS	153 FPS
high	115 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	139 FPS
medium	111 FPS	117 FPS
high	95 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	74 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	65 FPS
medium	67 FPS	59 FPS
high	55 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	649 FPS	336 FPS
medium	549 FPS	304 FPS
high	448 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	210 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	287 FPS
medium	484 FPS	264 FPS
high	407 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	182 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	184 FPS
medium	303 FPS	169 FPS
high	277 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	115 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	665 FPS	552 FPS
medium	557 FPS	505 FPS
high	509 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	407 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	531 FPS
medium	458 FPS	439 FPS
high	419 FPS	385 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	341 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	401 FPS
medium	322 FPS	318 FPS
high	292 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	234 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
1080p
low	665 FPS	552 FPS
medium	665 FPS	552 FPS
high	665 FPS	552 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	487 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	552 FPS
medium	665 FPS	535 FPS
high	607 FPS	462 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	391 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	416 FPS
medium	488 FPS	382 FPS
high	439 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	295 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,077 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — a 35.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950's 22,077 — a 18.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 18,780 (29.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,961, a 7.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 10,100 (3.9% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+44%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	32 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	26,609+21%	22,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	18,780+34%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116+8%	1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	10,100+4%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950) — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 1950).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Socket	AM4	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 1950 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Ryzen Threadripper 1950 rivals Core i9-7960X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Ryzen Threadripper 1950
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 debuted at $999. On MSRP ($299 vs $999), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $700 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 22.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 120.4% better value option.