
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2660 v3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,146 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 886.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon E5-2660 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,039 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon E5-2660 v3
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +34.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,146 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 886.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,445 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 105W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅66.7% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2660 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,039 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($1,445 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌61.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon E5-2660 v3?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 212 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 116 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 278 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 326 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 326 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon E5-2660 v3


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2660 v3
Xeon E5-2660 v3
The Xeon E5-2660 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 13,039 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2660 v3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon E5-2660 v3's 13,039 — a 68.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2660 v3.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+39% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+28% | 25 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) |
| PassMark | 26,609+104% | 13,039 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2660 v3). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2660 v3) — the Xeon E5-2660 v3 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2660 v3).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon E5-2660 v3 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2660 v3). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon E5-2660 v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2660 v3 debuted at $1445. On MSRP ($299 vs $1445), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $1146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2660 v3 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 163.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon E5-2660 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-79% | $1445 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+889% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












