
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon Gold 6138
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,313 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 864.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6138 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 15,439).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,313 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 864.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Gold 6138 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,715 vs 15,439).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon Gold 6138 better than Ryzen 7 5700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 82 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 603 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 506 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 603 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 563 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 320 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon Gold 6138


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6138
Xeon Gold 6138
The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon Gold 6138 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5700X (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon Gold 6138's 24,108 — a 9.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,116 vs 1,261, a 50.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,715 vs 15,439 (45.5% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+24% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+70% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+16% | 27.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 20 MB+3900% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 26,609+10% | 24,108 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116+68% | 1,261 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | 15,439+59% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon Gold 6138 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138) — the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6138).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6138 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6138). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming, Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon Gold 6138 debuted at $2612. On MSRP ($299 vs $2612), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $2313 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138 — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 162.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-89% | $2612 |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0+867% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












