
Ryzen 7 5700X
Popular choices:

Xeon W-10855M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 5700X
2022Xeon W-10855M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +25.8% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $181 less on MSRP ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 103.8 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($118 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 89.0 vs 103.8 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $118 MSRP).
- ❌4233.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 1.5W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5700X across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 26,609).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5700X better than Xeon W-10855M?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 89 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 649 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 549 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 448 FPS | 254 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 552 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 407 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 350 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 343 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 303 FPS | 207 FPS |
| high | 277 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 159 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 557 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 509 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 439 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 458 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 419 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 402 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 294 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 665 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 607 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 533 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 306 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 439 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 385 FPS | 306 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-10855M


Ryzen 7 5700X
Ryzen 7 5700X
The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-10855M
Xeon W-10855M
The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-10855M offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 5700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 6.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 73.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 5700X. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 4.9 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+21% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+167% | 12 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.5 MB+200% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) | Comet Lake-H (2020) |
| PassMark | 26,609+117% | 12,249 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,116 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,715 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) / not specified (Xeon W-10855M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Gaming | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-10855M debuted at $118. On MSRP ($299 vs $118), the Xeon W-10855M is $181 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 103.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-10855M — making the Xeon W-10855M the 15.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5700X | Xeon W-10855M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $118-61% |
| Performance per Dollar | 89.0 | 103.8+17% |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












