PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 879.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3275M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 40,419).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 5700X

2022

Xeon W-3275M

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,150 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Delivers 879.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 89.0 vs 9.1 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,449 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3275M across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,609 vs 40,419).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 39 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275M, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.1 vs 89.0 PassMark/$ ($4,449 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3275M better than Ryzen 7 5700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon W-3275M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 5700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3275M is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 27.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3275M is the better fit. You are getting 51.9% better PassMark, backed by 28 cores and 56 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 20.3% larger total L3 cache (39 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3275M is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 5700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon W-3275M is 1388.0% more expensive on MSRP at $4,449 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and it gives you a 27.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 5700X is also 879.6% better value on MSRP (89.0 vs 9.1 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 5700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 5700X Benchmark Check

Xeon W-3275M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	156 FPS	198 FPS
medium	129 FPS	162 FPS
high	115 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	159 FPS
medium	111 FPS	125 FPS
high	95 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	83 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	87 FPS
medium	67 FPS	74 FPS
high	55 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	47 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3275M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	649 FPS	607 FPS
medium	549 FPS	522 FPS
high	448 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	371 FPS
1440p
low	552 FPS	514 FPS
medium	484 FPS	447 FPS
high	407 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	350 FPS	306 FPS
4K
low	343 FPS	306 FPS
medium	303 FPS	266 FPS
high	277 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	213 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3275M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	665 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	557 FPS	928 FPS
high	509 FPS	876 FPS
ultra	439 FPS	793 FPS
1440p
low	554 FPS	808 FPS
medium	458 FPS	715 FPS
high	419 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	358 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	402 FPS	519 FPS
medium	322 FPS	429 FPS
high	292 FPS	387 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	315 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3275M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
1080p
low	665 FPS	1010 FPS
medium	665 FPS	1010 FPS
high	665 FPS	885 FPS
ultra	665 FPS	773 FPS
1440p
low	665 FPS	932 FPS
medium	665 FPS	804 FPS
high	607 FPS	702 FPS
ultra	533 FPS	603 FPS
4K
low	545 FPS	680 FPS
medium	488 FPS	591 FPS
high	439 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	385 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 5700X Open Xeon W-3275M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 5700X and Xeon W-3275M

Ryzen 7 5700X

The Ryzen 7 5700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 26,609 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3275M

The Xeon W-3275M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 40,419 points. Launch price was $7,453.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 5700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3275M offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275M has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275M — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3275M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5700X scores 26,609 against the Xeon W-3275M's 40,419 — a 41.2% lead for the Xeon W-3275M. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5700X vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275M.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	28 / 56+250%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.4 GHz+36%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	38.5 MB+20%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	28 MB+5500%
Process	7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	26,609	40,419+52%
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,116	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	9,715	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 5700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3275M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5700X versus 2933 on the Xeon W-3275M — the Xeon W-3275M supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275M supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275M). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275M) — the Xeon W-3275M offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370,B450,X470,B550,X570 (Ryzen 7 5700X) and C620 (Xeon W-3275M).

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
Socket	AM4	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	2933+73225%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+6553500%	2048
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 7 5700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3275M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5700X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275M). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5700X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 5700X rivals Core i7-11700K; Xeon W-3275M rivals EPYC 7742.

Feature	Ryzen 7 5700X	Xeon W-3275M
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 5700X launched at $299 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3275M debuted at $4449. On MSRP ($299 vs $4449), the Ryzen 7 5700X is $4150 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 5700X delivers 89.0 pts/$ vs 9.1 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3275M — making the Ryzen 7 5700X the 162.9% better value option.