
Ryzen 7 5800

Xeon Gold 6142
Ryzen 7 5800 vs Xeon Gold 6142 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 5800 vs Xeon Gold 6142 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 5800 vs Xeon Gold 6142: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+45.5% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 22 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6142, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $349 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6142 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 6142
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 5800 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,490 vs 25,735).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (22 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 5800 better than Xeon Gold 6142?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5800 vs Xeon Gold 6142 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6142
The Xeon Gold 6142 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 25,490 points. Launch price was $2,946.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 5800 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6142 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6142 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6142 — a 21.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 5800 uses the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6142 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 5800 scores 25,735 against the Xeon Gold 6142's 25,490 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 6142.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon Gold 6142 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz+24% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz+31% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+45% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+3100% | 16 MB |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Vermeer (2020−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 25,735 | 25,490 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 5800 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6142 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800 versus 2666 on the Xeon Gold 6142 — the Ryzen 7 5800 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6142 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 5800) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6142). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 5800) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6142) — the Xeon Gold 6142 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon Gold 6142 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+20% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 5800 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Gold 6142 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6142). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6142 rivals EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 5800 | Xeon Gold 6142 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | OEM Gaming | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













