
Core i7-13700H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-13700H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Ryzen 7 5800 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.1 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($502 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 26,140).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-13700H
2023Ryzen 7 5800
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (96EU), while Ryzen 7 5800 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Costs $153 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 41.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.7 vs 52.1 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $502 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.1 vs 73.7 PassMark/$ ($502 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (25,735 vs 26,140).
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i7-13700H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-13700H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700H better than Ryzen 7 5800?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 233 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 243 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 162 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 138 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 569 FPS | 541 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 419 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 551 FPS |
| medium | 520 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 430 FPS | 401 FPS |
| ultra | 363 FPS | 345 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 366 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 253 FPS | 241 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 547 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 613 FPS | 425 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 507 FPS | 358 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 595 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 442 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 374 FPS | 231 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| ultra | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 654 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 654 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 597 FPS | 536 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 556 FPS |
| medium | 558 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 502 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 432 FPS | 391 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700H and Ryzen 7 5800

Core i7-13700H
Core i7-13700H
The Core i7-13700H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,140 points. Launch price was $502.


Ryzen 7 5800
Ryzen 7 5800
The Ryzen 7 5800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 25,735 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700H versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800 — a 8.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700H (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-13700H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700H scores 26,140 against the Ryzen 7 5800's 25,735 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i7-13700H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700H vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+9% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz+42% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 26,140+2% | 25,735 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 20,101 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,279 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,208 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the Core i7-13700H versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 5800 — the Core i7-13700H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 5800 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (Core i7-13700H) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 5800) — the Core i7-13700H offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | 128 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28+17% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i7-13700H supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700H) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800). The Core i7-13700H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (96EU)), while the Ryzen 7 5800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics (96EU) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-13700H launched at $502 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5800 debuted at $349. On MSRP ($502 vs $349), the Ryzen 7 5800 is $153 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-13700H delivers 52.1 pts/$ vs 73.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5800 — making the Ryzen 7 5800 the 34.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-13700H | Ryzen 7 5800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $502 | $349-30% |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.1 | 73.7+41% |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












