Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275

Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 8840HX

12 / 24

42,275

+2.4%

Ryzen 7 7735H

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Xeon W-3275

28 / 56

41,267

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 8840HX

2025

Why buy it

✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 205W, a 150W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Xeon W-3275 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3275, which brings 28 cores / 56 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3275

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 28 cores / 56 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 28.
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (41,267 vs 42,275).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (39 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $4,449 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌272.7% higher power demand at 205W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 8840HX moves to FL1 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 8840HX better than Xeon W-3275?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3275 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 8840HX is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 8840HX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 8840HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 8840HX is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon W-3275 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 8840HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $4,449 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon W-3275 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 8840HX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FL1 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 66.2% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 39 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 28/56. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 8840HX

The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3275

The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 8840HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 42,275 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 2.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.

Feature	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon W-3275
Cores / Threads	12 / 24	28 / 56+133%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+11%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz+16%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+66%	38.5 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	28 MB+2700%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Dragon Range (2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	42,275+2%	41,267

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).

Feature	Ryzen 7 8840HX	Xeon W-3275
Socket	FL1	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	5600+75%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	64	1024+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275). The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.