Ryzen 7 8840HX vs Xeon W-3275
Ryzen 7 8840HX
Xeon W-3275
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8840HX
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3275
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 7 8840HX | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Dragon Range (2025) / 5 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 7 8840HX | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,550) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 8840HX and Xeon W-3275
Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon W-3275
The Xeon W-3275 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 28 cores and 56 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 38.5 MB. L2 cache: 28 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 41,267 points. Launch price was $4,449.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 8840HX packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3275 offers 28 cores / 56 threads — the Xeon W-3275 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3275 — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8840HX (base: 2.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the Dragon Range (2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon W-3275 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 8840HX scores 42,275 against the Xeon W-3275's 41,267 — a 2.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX vs 38.5 MB on the Xeon W-3275.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8840HX | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 28 / 56+133% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+11% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.9 GHz+16% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total)+66% | 38.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 28 MB+2700% |
| Process | 5 nm-64% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Dragon Range (2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 42,275+2% | 41,267 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 8840HX uses the FL1 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-3275 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the Ryzen 7 8840HX versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3275 — the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports 54.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3275 supports up to 1024 of RAM compared to 64 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 6 (Xeon W-3275). PCIe lanes: 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs 64 (Xeon W-3275) — the Xeon W-3275 offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) and C621 (Xeon W-3275).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8840HX | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FL1 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 | 1024+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3275). The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the Xeon W-3275 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon W-3275 rivals Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 8840HX | Xeon W-3275 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 780M | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 7 8840HX and Xeon W-3275
