
Core i7-14700F

Ryzen 7 8840HX
Core i7-14700F vs Ryzen 7 8840HX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-14700F vs Ryzen 7 8840HX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-14700F vs Ryzen 7 8840HX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-14700F
2024Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8840HX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,456 vs 42,275).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $359 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8840HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
Ryzen 7 8840HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+93.9% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 780M, while Core i7-14700F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8840HX better than Core i7-14700F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-14700F vs Ryzen 7 8840HX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-14700F
The Core i7-14700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,456 points. Launch price was $359.


Ryzen 7 8840HX
The Ryzen 7 8840HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 42,275 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14700F packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-14700F has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8840HX — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700F scores 41,456 against the Ryzen 7 8840HX's 42,275 — a 2% lead for the Ryzen 7 8840HX. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700F vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8840HX.
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 28+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+6% | 5.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+38% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+94% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 41,456 | 42,275+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 8840HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Core i7-14700F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700F) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8840HX) — the Ryzen 7 8840HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770 (Core i7-14700F) and FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 7 8840HX).
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | 5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+200% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 28+40% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8840HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-14700F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8840HX). The Ryzen 7 8840HX includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 780M), while the Core i7-14700F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-14700F targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Ryzen 7 8840HX rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | Ryzen 7 8840HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













