Core i7-14700F
EPYC 7313P
Core i7-14700F vs EPYC 7313P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-14700F vs EPYC 7313P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-14700F vs EPYC 7313P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-14700F
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $554 less on MSRP ($359 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 115.5 vs 44.9 PassMark/$ ($359 MSRP vs $913 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 155W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (33 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7313P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
EPYC 7313P
2021Why buy it
- ✅+287.9% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 33 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-14700F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (41,017 vs 41,456).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.9 vs 115.5 PassMark/$ ($913 MSRP vs $359 MSRP).
- ❌138.5% higher power demand at 155W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i7-14700F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-14700F better than EPYC 7313P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-14700F vs EPYC 7313P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i7-14700F
The Core i7-14700F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 33 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,456 points. Launch price was $359.
EPYC 7313P
The EPYC 7313P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 41,017 points. Launch price was $913.
Processing Power
The Core i7-14700F packs 20 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7313P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core i7-14700F has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-14700F versus 3.7 GHz on the EPYC 7313P — a 37.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-14700F (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7313P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i7-14700F scores 41,456 against the EPYC 7313P's 41,017 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i7-14700F. L3 cache: 33 MB (total) on the Core i7-14700F vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7313P.
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 28+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+46% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3 GHz+43% |
| L3 Cache | 33 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+288% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 41,456+1% | 41,017 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 19,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-14700F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7313P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i7-14700F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7313P — the Core i7-14700F supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7313P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-14700F) vs 8 (EPYC 7313P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i7-14700F) vs 128 (EPYC 7313P) — the EPYC 7313P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,H770 (Core i7-14700F) and SP3 (EPYC 7313P).
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 7313P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-14700F) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7313P). Primary use case: Core i7-14700F targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i7-14700F rivals Ryzen 7 7700; EPYC 7313P rivals Xeon Gold 6334.
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-14700F was priced at $359, while the EPYC 7313P came in at $913. On launch pricing ($359 vs $913), Core i7-14700F was $554 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-14700F delivers 115.5 pts/$ vs 44.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7313P — making the Core i7-14700F the 88% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-14700F | EPYC 7313P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $359-61% | $913 |
| Performance per Dollar | 115.5+157% | 44.9 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-14700F and EPYC 7313P
