
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE

Xeon W-3225
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Xeon W-3225 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Xeon W-3225 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Xeon W-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,010 less on MSRP ($309 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 59.6 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($309 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 17 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+106.3% larger total L3 cache (17 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,251 vs 18,409).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.8 vs 59.6 PassMark/$ ($1,319 MSRP vs $309 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE better than Xeon W-3225?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Xeon W-3225 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,409 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE and Xeon W-3225 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3225 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE scores 18,409 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.4 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz+19% |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 16.5 MB+106% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Renoir (2020−2023) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,409 | 18,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,100 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 1024 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 64 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). Primary use case: Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE was priced at $309, while the Xeon W-3225 came in at $1319. On launch pricing ($309 vs $1319), Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE was $1010 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE delivers 59.6 pts/$ vs 13.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3225 — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE the 124.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $309-77% | $1319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 59.6+332% | 13.8 |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














