
Core 5 210H
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 5 210H
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 210H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,409 vs 18,602).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 210H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Core 5 210H
2024Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.6% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 45W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 45W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core 5 210H across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,409 vs 18,602).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $309 MSRP, while Core 5 210H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core 5 210H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 210H better than Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 141 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 291 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 461 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 404 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 336 FPS | 262 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 465 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 465 FPS | 390 FPS |
| ultra | 427 FPS | 329 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 5 210H and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE

Core 5 210H
Core 5 210H
The Core 5 210H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 18,602 points. Launch price was $342.


Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
The Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,409 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core 5 210H packs 8 cores / 12 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core 5 210H versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE — a 11% clock advantage for the Core 5 210H (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 210H scores 18,602 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE's 18,409 — a 1% lead for the Core 5 210H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core 5 210H vs 8 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 12 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz+41% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 18,602+1% | 18,409 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 210H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 210H | Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












